For many weeks now, I've been seeking employment; in the process, submitting applications by what has become the most common method for most companies of significant size - and many smaller ones as well: online via a corporate website, or via email.
Let me say at the outset that this is quite a welcome change from past methods, with the huge advantage being that I can submit many applications in a single day - greatly improving my odds in the currently horrific job market.
Needless to say, submitting by email is by far the easiest method in general - assuming one has all the information the job posting requests (e.g., cover letter, resume, and other requested details in "electronic" format). Occasionally I've encountered limitations (like "text only" resume requests) that complicate matters somewhat, but with my personal (technology) background, said complications are minor nuisances rather than show-stoppers.
The real inspiration for this post is the online application process via corporate or institutional websites. Again, one is best off to be prepared with all the details in electronic form - and most (but not all!) company websites will accept uploads of resumes and (in some cases) cover letters, etc. Some really snazzy websites will even do a pretty good job of parsing an uploaded resume into an online application - (like the "real" world, both are normally required) filling out some of the application fields for you. Those, of course, are the "snazzy" ones - as you might guess, it's some of the not-so-snazzy ones that drive this applicant nuts.
Not very often, but too often for a dedicated job seeker, one of these "Webby Apps" (as I call them - computer programs run on a server, and presented via the Internet) fails miserably to complete the (employment) application process. Either the website will take a major "Internal Server Error" - shutting down the whole application process - or what I call the "play through" of the designed application procedure will be so fraught with glitches and limitations (e.g., maximum text lengths), that creating an effective application is virtually impossible. In these situations, I'm led to wonder if the company in question is serious about taking employment applications online at all.
I've even encountered a situation where I successfully submitted an application for a job I neither desired nor was qualified for - because the website had the job posting number cross-referenced with two entirely different positions! In other words, I applied for one job, and was congratulated for applying for the other. I may never find out which position I actually applied for in that case.
All told, it's a good thing I consider my daily online job search process as part of "my current job" - meaning I expect to work at it; meaning (like all work) there are challenges and frustrations as a matter of course, along with the successes. I also consider this process (along with my entire lifestyle right now) an adventure - turning over rocks (be they heavy or light) to see what wriggles out - knowing that eventually I'll get rewarded with a prize catch.
Ever hopeful, and still blessed...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Paul,
ReplyDeleteI've run into all of the things you describe in your post in my own personal job search. But, unlike yourself, I am not well versed in technology and my show has stopped many times. Grrrr....
The other perils of launching a valiant effort for employment is that I get emails from job sites, where I have registered, for Patrick K. Shannon and Natalie Novack. And try as I may I cannot seem to rectify the matter. It makes me wonder how secure my information really is??
I just can't picture myself as a Patrick, however, being addressed as Natalie Novack has a certain beauty and mystery attached to it. I'm picturing Natalie Wood's good looks and Kim Novak's sultry mystique--your typical West Side Story/Vertigo persona. Maybe I'll take up acting???
Isee*, or Natalie/Kim, as the case might be :),
ReplyDeleteThat's indeed quite the bizarre and unsettling job search result - perhaps even more so for Patrick and Natalie themselves.
I still wrestle daily with how much personal information I really want to reveal in the (wide) variety of online modes (this blog being one) I participate in - but lately I've gravitated to the idea that little harm can come to one (like myself) who has lost most of his "reputation" to his disease (see other posts on this blog if confused). Thus I "err" on the side of openness, and let the chips fall where they may.
Thanks, BTW, for taking the time to comment here - I wish you well in your own search (if it continues).